Treatment Options in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: A Scoping Review
Singh N., Mishra N., Ghatage P.
Prospective Study, published in Cureus (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Cureus (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33786234
- PMCID
- PMC7995233
- DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.13527
- Citations
- 15
Abstract (original English)
Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder, which affects women of all ages. The aim of this review is to focus on first-line, second-line, and maintenance therapies as well as follow-up of women with VLS. With numerous controversies, we decided to conduct a scoping review on this subject. A review protocol was developed, and the Knowledge Resource Services website was used to run a search of articles pertaining to VLS with keywords "Vulvar," "Vulval," and "Lichen Sclerosus." The search was limited to published data from the last 10 years, i.e., July 2009 onward, and researches published in English language. A total of 338 articles pertaining to VLS were obtained. Out of this, 62 were original articles related to management of VLS. Effective treatments such as high-potency topical steroids are now the standard of care and first-line treatment. Follow-up may be done every three to six months for the first two years and then at least yearly to ensure adequacy of treatment and encourage compliance. Long-term follow-up in specialist clinics is recommended for women who have persistent complaints, thickened skin, or history of neoplastic lesion. Monitoring young patients yearly is recommended as there are chances of recurrence.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.