Treatment of postherpetic neuralgia by bone marrow aspirate injection: A case report
Honda Pazili T.
Case Report / Series, published in World J Clin Cases (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Case Report / Series
- Journal
- World J Clin Cases (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 37383904
- PMCID
- PMC10294184
- DOI
- 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3619
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Background Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most frequent and a difficult-to-treat complication of herpes zoster (HZ). Its symptoms include allodynia, hyperalgesia, burning, and an electric shock-like sensation stemming from the hyperexcitability of damaged neurons and varicella-zoster virus-mediated inflammatory tissue damage. HZ-related PHN has an incidence of 5%-30%, and in some patients, the pain is intolerable and can lead to insomnia or depression. In many cases, the pain is resistant to pain-relieving drugs, necessitating radical therapy. Case summary We present the case of a patient with PHN whose pain was not cured by conventional treatments, such as analgesics, block injections, or Chinese medicines, but by bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection containing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. BMAC has already been used for joint pains. However, this is the first report on its use for PHN treatment. Conclusion This report reveals that bone marrow extract can be a radical therapy for PHN.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.