Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Treatment of Spinocerebellar Ataxia With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Phase I/IIa Clinical Study.

Tsai YA., Liu RS., Lirng JF., Yang BH., Chang CH., Wang YC.

Clinical Trial on Neuroinflammation, published in Cell Transplant (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Cell Transplant (2017)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28195034
DOI
10.3727/096368916X694373

Abstract (original English)

Ataxia is one of the most devastating symptoms of many neurodegenerative disorders. As of today, there is not any effective treatment to retard its progression. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown promise in treating neurodegenerative diseases. We hereby report the results of a phase I/IIa clinical study conducted in Taiwan to primarily evaluate the safety, tolerability, and, secondarily, the possible efficacy of intravenous administration of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived MSCs from healthy donors. Six patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 and one with multiple system atrophy-cerebellar type were included in this open-label study with intravenous administration of 106 cells/kg body weight. The subjects were closely monitored for 1 year for safety (vital signs, complete blood counts, serum biochemical profiles, and urinalysis) and possible efficacy (scale for assessment and rating of ataxia and sensory organization testing scores, metabolite ratios on the brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and brain glucose metabolism of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose using positron emission tomography). No adverse events related to the injection of MSCs during the 1-year follow-up were observed. The intravenous administration of allogeneic MSCs seemed well tolerated. Upon study completion, all patients wished to continue treatment with the allogeneic MSCs. We conclude that allogeneic M

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AdultAgedBrainCells, CulturedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research