Trends and Patterns in Mandible Bone Cancer Research: An Updated Comprehensive Bibliometric Review : Prevalence of Supernumerary Teeth in Patients with Cleft lip and Palate
Arabion H., Khosronejad A., Afshar A., Iraji A., Mokhtarzadegan M., Aliabadi E.
Prospective Study, published in Galen Med J (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Galen Med J (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42040008
- PMCID
- PMC12460994
- DOI
- 10.31661/gmj.v13isp1.3541
Abstract (original English)
Background Mandible bone cancer, while relatively rare, poses significant challenges due to its aggressive nature and the complex treatment required. This bibliometric review aims to analyze the trends and patterns in mandible bone cancer research from 1933 to 2024, providing insights into the evolution of scholarly contributions and the impact of various studies in this field. Materials and methods Data were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases, focusing on articles published between 1933 and 2024. A total of 8,093 articles were analyzed, with performance metrics evaluated using RStudio and the bibliometrix R-package. Key metrics included publication growth, citation analysis, and keyword frequency assessment. Results The analysis revealed a steady annual growth rate of 6.05% in publications, with significant contributions from institutions such as the University of California and Tokyo Medical and Dental University. The average citation per manuscript was 18.41, indicating robust engagement with the literature. Key themes identified included mandible, mandibular reconstruction, and osteoradionecrosis, reflecting ongoing research interests and collaborative networks among authors. Conclusion This review highlights the increasing scholarly attention on mandible bone cancer, emphasizing the need for continued research to address existing gaps in
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.