Tuning Rheology and Printability of Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate Bioinks: The Role of Sodium Alginate Molar Mass and Sterilization
Hájovská P., Kroneková Z., Cseriová Z., Ház A., Jančovičová V., Danišovič Ĺ.
Laboratory Study, published in ACS Omega (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- ACS Omega (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41179182
- PMCID
- PMC12573050
- DOI
- 10.1021/acsomega.5c05476
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)/sodium alginate (SA) bioinks are widely explored for various biomedical applications due to their favorable biocompatibility and tunable properties. However, the molar mass (MM) of SA, a critical factor influencing bioink properties, has not yet been systematically investigated in these systems. In this work, we highlight the importance of SA MM as a key parameter that governs the rheological behavior of GelMA/SA bioinks, directly impacting their printability and the structural and mechanical characteristics of the resulting hydrogels. Three types of SA used are characterized by very low (SA-VL), low (SA-L), and medium (SA-M) weight-average MM ranging between 38 and 260 kg·mol -1 . In addition, the variability in the MM of SA is included as a result of SA sterilization by autoclaving. MM exponentially decreases with sterilization time for all SA samples showing a 37% drop for SA-VL and about a 65% drop for SA-M and SA-L after 20 min of sterilization time. MM of SA significantly affects the viscoelasticity of GelMA/SA bioinks, which enables us to recognize the conditions suitable for bioprinting tested by employing various printing conditions. SA-VL did not provide the required quality of printed strands due to high elasticity. The compression analysis of hydrogels suggests that formation of the GelMA covalent network is independent of the MM of SA,
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.