Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Ultrasound cavitation: a reliable non-enzymatic method for adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADSC) isolation.

Park JH., Choi Y., Shin JM., Yang HW., Jeong SH., Park IH.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2023)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
37280695
PMCID
PMC10246357
DOI
10.1186/s13287-023-03383-8
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Adipose tissue is known to serve as an abundant and readily accessible source of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) as an alternative to bone marrow. Collagenase is one of the most widely used methods for the isolation of ADSCs from adipose tissue, but it takes a long time, and there are also debates about safety. We propose an ultrasonic cavitation-treated method that can significantly reduce time and avoid the problem of using xenogeneic enzymes in ADSCs isolation. Methods ADSCs were isolated from adipose tissue using the enzyme treatment method and the ultrasonic cavitation treatment method. Cell proliferation was measured using cell viability assay. The expression levels of the surface markers of ADSCs were estimated by real-time PCR. After, ADSCs were cultured in chondrogenic, osteogenic, or adipogenic differentiation medium; the differentiation potential of ADCSs was analyzed by Alcian blue, Alizarin Red S, Oil Red O, and real-time PCR. Results The cells treated with collagenase and ultrasound had similar cell yields and proliferation after isolation. The difference in the expression of surface markers of ADSCs was not statistically significant. ADSCs showed differentiation potential into adipocytes, osteocytes, and chondrocytes, and there was no difference between the enzyme treatment method and the ultrasonic cavitation treatment method. The yield of the ADSC

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Stem CellsAdipose TissueAdipocytesMesenchymal Stem CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, Cultured

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research