Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Ultrastructural analysis of human umbilical cord derived MSCs at undifferentiated stage and during osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation.

Ozkan S., Isildar B., Oncul M., Baslar Z., Kaleli S., Koyuturk M.

Laboratory Study, published in Ultrastruct Pathol (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Ultrastruct Pathol (2018)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29624114
DOI
10.1080/01913123.2018.1453905

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered as an important tool for regenerative medicine and experimental treatments. Unveiling the ultrastructural changes during the differentiation of MSCs might help us to understand the nature of the process and to develop novel therapeutic approaches. For this purpose, human umbilical cord (hUC) was chosen as MSC source. In the first place, MSCs were isolated from sub-amniotic, intervascular and perivascular areas of hUC by enzymatic and tissue explant method to determine the most favorable region of hUC and technique for further processing. Therefore, microscopic and growth kinetics analyses showed that there was no clear difference in the morphologies and proliferation rates among the hUC-MSC groups. Flow cytometric analysis showed that CD44 and CD90 MSC markers were highly expressed, while CD34 and CD45 hematopoietic stem cells markers were expressed at low degree. Because our preliminary results showed that there was no conspicuous superiority among the hUC-MSCs groups, whole UC was utilized as a source, and tissue explant method was applied to isolate MSCs for further differentiation analysis. At the 1 st and 3 rd week of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, ultrastructural analysis showed an increase in the number of secondary lysosomes in comparison with the undifferentiated status. Increase in the mitochondrial content was

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesCell DifferentiationCell SeparationFemaleFetal BloodHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionOsteocytesPregnancy

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.