Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Understanding the mechanism of radiation induced fibrosis and therapy options.

Ejaz A., Greenberger JS., Rubin PJ.

Narrative Review, published in Pharmacol Ther (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Pharmacol Ther (2019)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31419518
DOI
10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107399
Citations
53

Abstract (original English)

Radiation therapy has been increasingly employed as a tool to cure and palliate majority of solid tumors. Although radiotherapy has shown promising results in preserving structure and function of organs, it is associated with late side effects mainly manifested in the form of tissue fibrosis. Recent advances in molecular biology techniques has helped better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in radiation induced fibrosis. Currently, very few treatment modalities are available to treat the condition with moderate success rate. Stem cell therapies and particularly adipose tissue and adipose derived stem cells therapies have shown promising results in clinical applications. Identification of the key factors involved in the mitigation process will help to enhance the beneficial effects and develop new therapy approaches.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsFibrosisHumansRadiotherapyStem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.