Unusual morphologic features of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A case report.
Meng LL., Jia XP., Lu LX., Zhang HZ., Shen XH., Piao ZH.
Case Report / Series, published in J Clin Lab Anal (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Case Report / Series
- Journal
- J Clin Lab Anal (2022)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 35642882
- DOI
- 10.1002/jcla.24502
Abstract (original English)
Endometrial stromal tumours are uncommon tumours of the uterus. They mainly occur in perimenopausal women. Tumours with typical clinicopathological features do not usually pose diagnostic problems. However, rare clinicopathological features can occur, and clinicians without significant experience may have difficulty diagnosing these tumours and managing these patients. Herein, we report a case of endometrial stromal sarcoma that occurred in a 25-year-old woman. The pathological features, immunophenotype, treatment and prognosis were discussed. The tumour revealed morphological heterogeneity, and there were similar proliferative-type endometrial stromal cells, an extensive amount of mature adipose tissue, and prominent rhabdomyoblastic and smooth muscle cells. Histopathological and immunohistochemical studies confirmed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with smooth muscle, adipocytic and rhabdomyoblastic differentiation (approximately 60% were differentiated tissues). The final treatment of the tumour was total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. There was no evidence of recurrence for 109 months postoperatively. We found that low-grade endometrial stromal tumours with extensive adipocytic and prominent rhabdomyoblastic differentiation are misdiagnosed because they are infrequent. They must be differentiated from rhabdomyosarcoma with accurate identif
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.