Uptake-release by MSCs of a cationic platinum(II) complex active in vitro on human malignant cancer cell lines.
Rimoldi I., Coccè V., Facchetti G., Alessandri G., Brini AT., Sisto F.
Laboratory Study, published in Biomed Pharmacother (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Biomed Pharmacother (2018)
- Country
- France
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 30218855
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.040
Abstract (original English)
In this study, the in vitro stability of cisplatin (CisPt) and cationic platinum(II)-complex (caPt(II)-complex) and their in vitro activity (antiproliferative and anti-angiogenic properties) were investigated against three aggressive human tumor cell lines. caPt(II)-complex shown a high stability until 9 days of treatment and displayed a significant and higher activity than CisPt against both NCI-H28 mesothelioma (19.37 ± 9.57 μM versus 34.66 ± 7.65 μM for CisPt) and U87 MG glioblastoma (19.85 ± 0.97 μM versus 54.14 ± 3.19 for CisPt). Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (AT-MSCs) showed a significant different sensitivity (IC 50 = 71.9 ± 15.1 μM for caPt(II)-complex and 8.7 ± 4.5 μM for CisPt) to the antiproliferative activity of caPt(II)-complex and CisPt. The ability of MSCs to uptake both the drugs in a similar amount of 2.49 pM /cell, suggested a possible development of new therapies based on cell mediated drug delivery.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.