Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMC

Use of allograft fat for aesthetic and functional restoration of soft tissue contour deformities

Salgado CJ., Gonzalez DI., Gelles-Soto D., Mercado A.

Case Report / Series on Knee, published in J Surg Case Rep (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
J Surg Case Rep (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36685121
PMCID
PMC9851659
DOI
10.1093/jscr/rjac629
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

The authors report a case series of five patients with Leneva grafted into the nose, hand, genitalia and below-the-knee stump. Leneva is an allograft adipose matrix derived from aseptically processed human adipose tissue with retained matrix proteins, growth factors, cytokines and collagens. It is manufactured hydrated and is available in pre-loaded syringes. Five patients (3F, 2 M) with a mean age of 50.7 (range 31-77 years) injected with a mean volume of 4.2 cc (range 3-6 cc) of Leneva in various anatomic locations with an average follow up time of 4.25 months (range 0.5-12 months) experienced no allergic reactions, infection, fat necrosis or oil cysts. All patients were pleased with the restoration of fullness to the injected site. The authors believe that Leneva is a promising multi-use filler for restoring soft tissue defects following resection of tumours, to rejuvenate age-related atrophy, aesthetically enhance the genitals and provide padding for transtibial prostheses.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research