Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Use of cerium oxide nanoparticles: a good candidate to improve skin tissue engineering.

Pesaraklou A., Mahdavi-Shahri N., Hassanzadeh H., Ghasemi M., Kazemi M., Mousavi NS.

Laboratory Study, published in Biomed Mater (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Biomed Mater (2019)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30754036
DOI
10.1088/1748-605X/ab0679
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Today advancements in nanotechnology have made extensive progress in tissue engineering. Application of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO 2 ) has improved regenerative medicine due to their antioxidant properties. In this study, nanoparticles were used to increase the efficacy of skin substitutes. Human skin samples were decellularized using four methods and studied via histological stainings and DNA content analyses. Then CeO 2 dispersing and its stability were investigated. The prepared acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) were immersed in CeO 2 suspension and their effects were evaluated on growth of cultured human adipose derived-mesenchymal stem cells (hAd-MSCs) using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and histological methods. Moreover, their antioxidant properties were assessed based on DPPH degradation. Changes in the collagen contents of the scaffolds containing cells and CeO 2 were also determined by electron microscopy and their tensile strength was compared to ADM. Our results indicated that use of trypsin/NaOH protocol resulted in most efficient cell removal while maintaining extracellular matrix (ECM) architecture. Among different dispersal methods, the approach using Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), wetting with fetal bovine serum (FBS) and ultrasonic bath resulted in the best stability. Furthermore, it was shown that CeO

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell ProliferationCell SurvivalCells, CulturedCeriumCollagenDNAExtracellular MatrixHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMetal Nanoparticles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.