Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

The use of scapular and parascapular flaps for cheek reconstruction.

Upton J., Albin RE., Mulliken JB., Murray JE.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 8 on Scar, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (1992) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (1992)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
8
Source database
PubMed
PMID
1448531
DOI
10.1097/00006534-199212000-00003

Abstract (original English)

This is a retrospective review of our experience with microvascular transfer of scapular and parascapular flaps for the correction of lateral facial contour deficiencies. Twenty-eight patients with congenital (n = 8) and acquired (n = 20) defects were treated with 30 flaps; two patients had bilateral flaps. The etiology of the defects included hemifacial microsomia (n = 2), oblique facial cleft (n = 1), Romberg's hemifacial atrophy (n = 5), neoplasm (n = 4), irradiation (n = 8), trauma (n = 4), tumor excision (n = 4), facial lipodystrophy (n = 2), and silicone granuloma (n = 2). The follow-up evaluation was from 2 to 13 years, with an average of 6 years. Fabrication of a facial moulage was part of the preoperative planning for each patient. These were compound flaps, including skin, deepithelialized skin, fat, fascia, and bone, if necessary. All flaps were constructed with an intact skin paddle for postoperative monitoring. Based on dissections and anatomic findings at operation, several variations in the level of emergence of the circumflex scapular artery from the triangular space and its branching patterns were noted. All flaps survived; changes in the patients' weights were reflected in the flaps. Twelve patients required secondary procedures: excision of skin monitor islands, scar revisions, debulking, or flap resuspension to the malar region. Bone grafts or alloplastic im

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdolescentAdultArteriesCheekChildChild, PreschoolCicatrixDissectionFascia

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research