Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A validated in vitro approach for low-frequency alternating-current stimulation of stem cells: From electrode characterization to biological responses.

Lembcke L., Bathel H., Zimmermann J., Engel V., Bader R., Frerich B.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Protoplasma (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Protoplasma (2026)
Country
Austria
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41999421
DOI
10.1007/s00709-026-02196-9

Abstract (original English)

Electrical stimulation remains a promising but insufficiently standardized approach in regenerative medicine, as many in vitro studies lack physically defined stimulation systems and quantitative characterization of cellular electric-field exposure. Here, we present a measurement-based framework integrating real-time electrical recordings, impedance-informed simulations, and electrode characterization under experimental conditions. Human adipose-derived stem cells were stimulated for three days at 20 Hz using sinusoidal alternating current at applied voltages of 1–3 Vrms. Simulations revealed spatially heterogeneous electric-field distributions, with exposure predominantly below 5 Vm⁻¹ at 1 Vrms and shifting toward 5–15 Vm⁻¹ at higher amplitudes. Moderate stimulation (1–2 Vrms) was not associated with detectable reductions in metabolic activity and was accompanied by maintained functional behaviour and stable reference gene expression, whereas 3 Vrms coincided with electrochemical interface alterations and reduced gene stability, suggesting the onset of stress-associated cellular responses. These findings identify a system-specific, biologically compatible and functionally active stimulation window and demonstrate that cellular responses are governed by the effective electrical dose rather than nominal voltage alone. The presented framework enables reproducible, impedance-contr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research