Validation of Microbiological Testing of Cellular Medicinal Products Containing Antibiotics
Lotfi R., Rojewski MT., Zeplin PH., Funk W., Pullig O., Nöth U.
Laboratory Study, published in Transfus Med Hemother (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Transfus Med Hemother (2020)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 32355474
- PMCID
- PMC7184824
- DOI
- 10.1159/000501284
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
Background The risk of microbial contamination of cellular products can be reduced when cultured in the presence of antibiotics. This however, may impact the sensitivity of microbiological tests. Given that the addition of antibiotics to cell/tissue products does not guarantee sterility but may just reduce the proliferation rate of microorganisms, microbiological testing of medicinal products remains obligatory. Thus, an appropriate method to test for microbial contamination of antibiotic-containing products has to be validated. Objectives In the context of microbiological testing of a cellular advance therapy medicinal product, the method was validated and approved by German competent authorities for four different matrices with three matrices containing antibiotics. The paper shall provide help for establishing test methods for other investigational medicinal products which contain antibiotics. Methods Matrices were spiked individually with Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Clostridium sporogenes, Propionibacterium acnes, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus brasiliensis . Samples were pretreated with penicillinase for 1 h before inoculation and incubation in BacT/ALERT iFA Plus and iFN Plus culture bottles using 3D BacT/ALERT automates. Microorganisms within positive BacT/ALERT bottles were specified. The
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.