Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

In vitro osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell spheroids impairs their in vivo vascularization capacity inside implanted porous polyurethane scaffolds.

Laschke MW., Schank TE., Scheuer C., Kleer S., Shadmanov T., Eglin D.

Animal Study, published in Acta Biomater (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Acta Biomater (2014)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24998773
DOI
10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.035
Citations
45

Abstract (original English)

Undifferentiated adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (adMSC) spheroids are attractive vascularization units for tissue engineering. Their osteogenic differentiation further offers the possibility of directed generation of bone constructs. The aim of this study was to analyze how this differentiation affects their in vivo vascularization capacity. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive adMSCs were isolated from C57BL/6-TgN(ACTB-EGFP)1Osb/J mice for the generation of undifferentiated and differentiated spheroids using the liquid overlay technique. Subsequently, polyurethane scaffolds were seeded with these spheroids and successful osteogenic differentiation was proven by von Kossa staining and high-resolution microtomography. The scaffolds were then implanted into dorsal skinfold chambers of C57BL/6 wild-type mice to analyze their vascularization and incorporation using intravital fluorescence microscopy, histology and immunohistochemistry. Scaffolds seeded with differentiated spheroids exhibited a markedly impaired vascularization. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that this was caused by the lost ability of differentiated spheroids to form GFP-positive microvascular networks inside the scaffolds. This was associated with a reduced tissue incorporation of the implants. Moreover, they no longer exhibited a mineralized matrix after the 14day implantation period, indicating

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAllograftsAnimalsCell DifferentiationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceMice, TransgenicNeovascularization, PhysiologicOsteogenesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.