Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

In vivo confocal microscopy evaluation of infiltrated immune cells in corneal stroma treated with cell therapy in advanced keratoconus.

El Zarif M., Abdul Jawad K., Alió JL., Makdissy N., De Miguel MP.

Clinical Trial, published in J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect (2024)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
38277094
DOI
10.1186/s12348-024-00385-2

Abstract (original English)

This study investigates immune cell (ICs) infiltration in advanced keratoconus patients undergoing autologous adipose-derived adult stem cell (ADASC) therapy with recellularized human donor corneal laminas (CL). A prospective clinical trial included fourteen patients divided into three groups: G-1, ADASCs; G-2, decellularized CL (dCL); and G-3, dCL recellularized with ADASCs (ADASCs-rCL). Infiltrated ICs were assessed using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) at 1,3,6, and12 months post-transplant. Infiltrated ICs, encompassing granulocytes and agranulocytes, were observed across all groups, categorized by luminosity, structure, and area. Stromal ICs infiltration ranged from 1.19% to 6.62%, with a consistent increase in group-related cell density (F = 10.68, P < .0001), independent of post-op time (F = 0.77, P = 0.511); the most substantial variations were observed in G-3 at 6 and 12 months (2.0 and 1.87-fold, respectively). Similarly, significant size increases were more group-dependent (F = 5.76, P < .005) rather than time-dependent (F = 2.84, P < .05); G-3 exhibited significant increases at 6 and 12 months (3.70-fold and 2.52-fold, respectively). A lamina-induced shift in IC size occurred (F = 110.23, P < .0001), primarily with 50-100 μm 2 sizes and up to larger cells > 300μm 2 , presumably macrophages, notably in G-3, indicating a potential role in tissue repair and remodeli

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.