Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Volume rejuvenation of the face

Lamb J.

Narrative Review on Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Mo Med (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mo Med (2010)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
20629289
PMCID
PMC6188315
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Patient's desires for an un-operated look and shorter recovery times have lead to a blending of surgical and nonsurgical techniques to effect facial rejuvenation. Anatomical changes within the skeleton and soft tissue compartments are discussed. A brief review of adjunctive techniques to replace volume lost in aging is presented. These techniques (autologous fat grafting and injectable fillers) are contrasted with more involved surgical procedures (rhytidectomy and sub-periosteal mid-face lifting). In patients with mild jowling, the "liquid facelift" can approach the results seen in surgical face-lifting. In patients with significant jowling, the addition of volume replacement at the time of rhytidectomy enhances the rejuvenation. The addition of volume replacement at the time of rhytidectomy has the potential to allow less aggressive surgical dissections to accomplish a harmonious result.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRejuvenationCosmetic TechniquesRhytidoplastyEstheticsSkin Aging

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research