What doesn't kill you makes you stranger: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (CD26) proteolysis differentially modulates the activity of many peptide hormones and cytokines generating novel cryptic bioactive ligands
Elmansi AM., Awad ME., Eisa NH., Kondrikov D., Hussein KA., Aguilar-Pérez A.
Narrative Review on Stroke Research, published in Pharmacol Ther (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Pharmacol Ther (2019)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 30759373
- PMCID
- PMC7883480
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.02.005
- Citations
- 26
Abstract (original English)
Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) is an exopeptidase found either on cell surfaces where it is highly regulated in terms of its expression and surface availability (CD26) or in a free/circulating soluble constitutively available and intrinsically active form. It is responsible for proteolytic cleavage of many peptide substrates. In this review we discuss the idea that DPP4-cleaved peptides are not necessarily inactivated, but rather can possess either a modified receptor selectivity, modified bioactivity, new antagonistic activity, or even a novel activity relative to the intact parent ligand. We examine in detail five different major DPP4 substrates: glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY), and neuropeptide Y (NPY), and stromal derived factor 1 (SDF-1 aka CXCL12). We note that discussion of the cleaved forms of these five peptides are underrepresented in the research literature, and are both poorly investigated and poorly understood, representing a serious research literature gap. We believe they are understudied and misinterpreted as inactive due to several factors. This includes lack of accurate and specific quantification methods, sample collection techniques that are inherently inaccurate and inappropriate, and a general perception that DPP4 cleavage inactivates its ligand substrates. Increasing evide
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: neuroimaging approaches and evidence from a systematic review
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in Front Neurol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Neurol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 3345 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Syst Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3345
Syst Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Curr Cardiol Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Curr Cardiol Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in Animal Models: A Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in CNS Neurosci Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
CNS Neurosci Ther5 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 1184 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 1184
Stem Cell Res Ther2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
In vitro and In vivo Studies on Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Ischemic Stroke Therapy: A Scoping Review of The Therapeutic Effect
Systematic Review on Stroke Research, published in Stem Cells Cloning (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Stem Cells Cloning