Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

What Patient-related Factors Most Strongly Influence Autologous Fat Grafting Volume Retention in Breast Augmentation?

Utsunomiya H., Maruyama N., Onodera T.

Laboratory Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39301307
PMCID
PMC11412707
DOI
10.1097/gox.0000000000006194
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Background Regarding autologous fat grafting for breast augmentation, the factors influencing volume retention are unclear. Few studies have assessed which factors, particularly patient-related variables, could affect volume retention and to what extent, without performing multivariate analysis. In this study, we performed three-dimensional breast volume measurements before and after autologous fat grafting, calculated the volume and volume retention, and investigated factors that may affect volume retention. Methods A total of 204 breasts that underwent autologous fat grafting by the same surgeon at our hospital between May 25 and December 25, 2021 were included. Volumetric measurements were taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively using a three-dimensional camera; volume retention was calculated. Linear mixed model analysis was performed to examine the effects of age, body mass index, number of total autologous fat grafting procedures, pregnancy and lactation history, smoking status, fat processing techniques (sedimentation versus centrifugation), preoperative volume, and weight change at the 3- and 6-month postoperative volume retention analyses. Results Using multivariate analysis, the preoperative volume was found to be a significant factor at 3 and 6 months. The preoperative volume affected fat volume retention rate by 0.004 ( P = 0.001) and 0.008 (

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.