Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

What's New in Hand Surgery: Transformative advancements and Emerging Trends

Ghanem W., Ezzeddine H., Kiwan E., Najjar J., Saad R., Ali M.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, published in Orthop Rev (Pavia) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Orthop Rev (Pavia) (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41694414
PMCID
PMC12904736
DOI
10.52965/001c.156459

Abstract (original English)

Hand surgery has undergone remarkable evolution over the past decade, driven by advances in microsurgery, biologics, imaging, and digital technologies. Key areas of progress include high-resolution imaging, minimally invasive surgery, wide-awake local anesthesia (WALANT), and biologic therapies such as platelet-rich plasma and stem cells. Reconstructive strategies have advanced with vascularized bone and nerve grafts, tendon repair techniques, and the integration of biologics with scaffolds and 3D printing. Technological innovations-artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality, robotics, and telemedicine-are redefining surgical education, intraoperative navigation, and rehabilitation. Despite rapid growth, challenges remain regarding validation, equity of access, and ethical considerations. This review highlights transformative developments, focusing on innovations that have reshaped diagnostic accuracy, surgical precision, and patient-centered outcomes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research