Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Xenofree enzymatic products for the isolation of human adipose-derived stromal/stem cells.

Carvalho PP., Gimble JM., Dias IR., Gomes ME., Reis RL.

Clinical Trial on Face & Skin, published in Tissue Eng Part C Methods (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Tissue Eng Part C Methods (2013)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23126465
DOI
10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0465

Abstract (original English)

Human adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASCs) are an abundant, readily available population of adult stem cells that reside in adipose tissue and that have a great potential utility for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine therapeutic applications. Several preclinical studies have shown that ASCs have therapeutic applicability, but a standardized isolation and expansion methodology for clinical cell therapy has yet to be established. ASC are typically isolated and expanded using reagents with xenogenic components and this may pose certain risks and safety issues, such as exposure to infectious agents and immune reactions, creating further obstacles to the translation of ASC-based therapies to clinical scenarios. The objective of this study was to determine the suitability and efficacy of various alternative enzymatic products, CLS1 (Worthington), CLSAFA (Worthington), NB4 (SERVA), and Liberase (Roche), for the digestion of adipose tissue and subsequent isolation of ASCs, assessing cell functionality concerning their proliferation and differentiation ability. Results show that there are no statistically significant differences on yield and proliferation of cells isolated after enzymatic digestion with any of the studied products. The differentiation potential of the cells was not affected, and cell surface marker expression was similar among all products. We concluded

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultAntigens, DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell SeparationCollagenasesFemaleHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research