Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

105 Burning Heart - An Animal Model of Chronic Heart Failure Following Severe Burn Injury

Animal Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in J Burn Care Res (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Burn Care Res (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMCID
PMC10185300

Abstract (original English)

Abstract Introduction Our clinical research unveiled chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as a long-term sequel in survivors of severe pediatric burn injury due to a yet unknown molecular pathomechanism. Applying a standardized rat model, we systematically determined the pathophysiological impact of burn injury on long-term cardiac performance to uncover systemic and molecular pathomechanisms that may cause post-burn HFpEF development. Methods Male adolescent SD-rats were subjected to a 60 % total body surface area (TBSA) full-thickness burn- or sham-trauma and subsequently characterized after burn-injury by serial transthoracic echocardiography, bulk myocardial next-generation sequencing and proteomics as well as RT-PCR, immuno-blotting (IB), histology and plasma proteomics for cardiac performance and molecular alterations, respectively, at 3, 7, 30 and 90days. Results In comparison to the sham-group (SG), animals from the burn-group (BG) recapitulated typical post-burn clinical traits, such as significant loss in body weight (BG 27 % less than SG at 30d, p Conclusions Here we report the development of HFpEF as a novel systemic consequence of severe burn injury in a rodent model, which warrants further mechanistic and translational studies. Cardiac inflammation and fibrosis are known to negatively impact cardiac performance and may be mechanistic key

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research