Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMedOpen access

3D bioprinting of fish skin-based gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) bio-ink for use as a potential skin substitute.

Tanadchangsaeng N., Pasanaphong K., Tawonsawatruk T., Rattanapinyopituk K., Tangketsarawan B., Rawiwet V.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, published in Sci Rep (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Sci Rep (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39369014
PMCID
PMC11455937
DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-73774-1
Citations
16

Abstract (original English)

Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), typically derived from mammalian sources, has recently emerged as an ideal bio-ink for three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Herein, we developed a fish skin-based GelMA bio-ink for the fabrication of a 3D GelMA skin substitute with a 3D bioprinter. Several concentrations of methacrylic acid anhydride were used to fabricate GelMA, in which their physical-mechanical properties were assessed. This fish skin-based GelMA bio-ink was loaded with human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs) and human platelet lysate (HPL) and then printed to obtain 3D ASCs + HPL-loaded GelMA scaffolds. Cell viability test and a preliminary investigation of its effectiveness in promoting wound closure were evaluated in a critical-sized full thickness skin defect in a rat model. The cell viability results showed that the number of ASCs increased significantly within the 3D GelMA hydrogel scaffold, indicating its biocompatibility property. In vivo results demonstrated that ASCs + HPL-loaded GelMA scaffolds could delay wound contraction, markedly enhanced collagen deposition, and promoted the formation of new blood vessels, especially at the wound edge, compared to the untreated group. Therefore, this newly fish skin-based GelMA bio-ink developed in this study has the potential to be utilized for the printing of 3D GelMA skin substitutes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
GelatinAnimalsPrinting, Three-DimensionalBioprintingHumansRatsSkin, ArtificialTissue ScaffoldsMesenchymal Stem CellsFishes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research