Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks

Griffin DR., Weaver WM., Scumpia PO., Di Carlo D., Segura T.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, published in Nat Mater (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Nat Mater (2015)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
26030305
PMCID
PMC4615579
DOI
10.1038/nmat4294
Citations
662

Abstract (original English)

Injectable hydrogels can provide a scaffold for in situ tissue regrowth and regeneration, yet gel degradation before tissue reformation limits the gels' ability to provide physical support. Here, we show that this shortcoming can be circumvented through an injectable, interconnected microporous gel scaffold assembled from annealed microgel building blocks whose chemical and physical properties can be tailored by microfluidic fabrication. In vitro, cells incorporated during scaffold formation proliferated and formed extensive three-dimensional networks within 48 h. In vivo, the scaffolds facilitated cell migration that resulted in rapid cutaneous-tissue regeneration and tissue-structure formation within five days. The combination of microporosity and injectability of these annealed gel scaffolds should enable novel routes to tissue regeneration and formation in vivo.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell LineFibroblastsSkinHumansBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsTissue EngineeringMaterials TestingMicrofluidicsRegeneration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research