Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Addressing the challenges of infectious bone defects: a review of recent advances in bifunctional biomaterials

Zhang H., Qiao W., Liu Y., Yao X., Zhai Y., Du L.

Narrative Review on Autoimmune Research, published in J Nanobiotechnology (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Nanobiotechnology (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40158189
PMCID
PMC11954225
DOI
10.1186/s12951-025-03295-0
Citations
22

Abstract (original English)

Infectious bone defects present a substantial clinical challenge due to the complex interplay between infection control and bone regeneration. These defects often result from trauma, autoimmune diseases, infections, or tumors, requiring a nuanced approach that simultaneously addresses infection and promotes tissue repair. Recent advances in tissue engineering and materials science, particularly in nanomaterials and nano-drug formulations, have led to the development of bifunctional biomaterials with combined osteogenic and antibacterial properties. These materials offer an alternative to traditional bone grafts, minimizing complications such as multiple surgeries, high antibiotic dosages, and lengthy recovery periods. This review examines the repair mechanisms in the infectious microenvironment and highlights various bifunctional biomaterials that foster both anti-infective and osteogenic processes. Emerging design strategies are also discussed to provide a forward-looking perspective on treating infectious bone defects with clinically significant outcomes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansBone Diseases, InfectiousBiocompatible MaterialsAnti-Bacterial AgentsTissue EngineeringBone RegenerationOsteogenesisNanostructures

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research