Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing of full-thickness skin defects: a review of the literature .

Huayllani MT., Sarabia-Estrada R., Restrepo DJ., Boczar D., Sisti A., Nguyen JH.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in J Plast Surg Hand Surg (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Plast Surg Hand Surg (2020)
Country
Sweden
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
32427016
DOI
10.1080/2000656X.2020.1767116
Citations
41

Abstract (original English)

The complex process of wound healing can be delayed in circumstances when the natural niche is extremely altered. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC) seem to be a promising therapy for these type of wounds. We aim to describe the studies that used ADSC for wound healing after a full-thickness skin defect, the ADSC mechanisms of action, and the outcomes of the different ADSC therapies applied to date. We performed a review by querying PubMed database for studies that evaluated the use of ADSC for wound healing. The Mesh terms, adipose stem cells AND (skin injury OR wound healing) and synonyms were used for the search. Our search recorded 312 articles. A total of 30 articles met the inclusion criteria. All were experimental in nature. ADSC was applied directly (5 [16.7%]), in sheets (2 [6.7%]), scaffolds (14 [46.7%]), skin grafts (3 [10%]), skin flaps (1 [3.3%]), as microvesicles or exosomes (4 [13.3%]), with adhesives for wound closure (1 [3.3%]), and in a concentrated conditioned hypoxia-preconditioned medium (1 [3.3%]). Most of the studies reported a benefit of ADSC and improvement of wound healing with all types of ADSC therapy. ADSC applied along with extracellular matrix, stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1) or keratinocytes, or ADSC seeded in scaffolds showed better outcomes in wound healing than ADSC alone. ADSC have shown to promote angiogenesis, fibroblast migration, and u

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueChemokine CXCL12Extracellular MatrixHumansKeratinocytesSkinStem Cell TransplantationTissue ScaffoldsWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research