Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Adipose tissue versus stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles to enhance the healing of acute burns.

Rohani Ivari J., Mahdipour E.

Animal Study on Burns, published in Regen Med (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Regen Med (2021)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34259030
DOI
10.2217/rme-2020-0199

Abstract (original English)

Aim: Proper healing of extensive burns remains a healthcare challenge. In the present study, we proposed a distinct therapeutic application of adipose tissue and small extracellular vesicles isolated from human menstrual blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MenSC) small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) to enhance the repair of third-degree burn injury. Materials & methods: Mouse model of third-degree burn was used. Adipose tissue in the form of nano-fat (NF) and MenSC-sEVs was injected subcutaneously at the site of injuries. Results: NF and sEVs were capable of enhancing wound closure and increasing neoangiogenesis. NF was also effective in accelerating the formation of granulation tissue and boosting the thickness of the new epithelial layer. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of NF and MenSC-sEVs as promising therapeutic approaches to facilitate the repair of skin burns.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBurnsExtracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research