Advanced function, design and application of skin substitutes for skin regeneration
Zhang M., Xing J., Zhong Y., Zhang T., Liu X., Xing D.
Clinical Trial on Hip, published in Mater Today Bio (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Mater Today Bio (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 38223459
- PMCID
- PMC10784320
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100918
- Citations
- 18
Abstract (original English)
The development of skin substitutes aims to replace, mimic, or improve the functions of human skin, regenerate damaged skin tissue, and replace or enhance skin function. This includes artificial skin, scaffolds or devices designed for treatment, imitation, or improvement of skin function in wounds and injuries. Therefore, tremendous efforts have been made to develop functional skin substitutes. However, there is still few reports systematically discuss the relationship between the advanced function and design requirements. In this paper, we review the classification, functions, and design requirements of artificial skin or skin substitutes. Different manufacturing strategies for skin substitutes such as hydrogels, 3D/4D printing, electrospinning, microfluidics are summarized. This review also introduces currently available skin substitutes in clinical trials and on the market and the related regulatory requirements. Finally, the prospects and challenges of skin substitutes in the field of tissue engineering are discussed.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Tissue Eng Regen Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Tissue Eng Regen Med - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Comparative efficacy of different doses of mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissue sources for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 602 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in PeerJ (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 602
PeerJ - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy of Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes in Promoting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Animal Studies.
Meta-analysis on Diabetic Foot, Chronic Wound, published in J Diabetes Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Diabetes Res - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The Role of Exosome-miRNA as Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Case-Control and Longitudinal Studies
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 3046 on Neuroinflammation, published in Actas Esp Psiquiatr (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3046
Actas Esp Psiquiatr - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Exosome-based therapy for epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Neurosci - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy of stem cell therapy for achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies
Meta-analysis on Tendon Injury, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Bioeng Biotechnol