Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Advancements in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Technology for Cardiac Regenerative Medicine

Suh CY., Wang Z., Bártulos O., Qyang Y.

Laboratory Study on Cardiovascular Disease, published in J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther (2014)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
24651517
PMCID
PMC4169350
DOI
10.1177/1074248414523676
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the developed world. Cellular-based cardiac regenerative therapy serves as a potential approach to treating cardiovascular diseases. Although various cellular types have been tested, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are regarded as a promising cell source for therapy. In this review, we will highlight some of the advances in generating iPSCs and differentiation to cardiac cells. We will also discuss the progress in modeling cardiovascular diseases using iPSCs-derived cardiac cells. As we continue to make progress in iPSC and cardiac differentiation technology, we will come closer to the application of cardiac regenerative medicine.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research