Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Advances in novel biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering and regenerative medicine

Pan W., Yu M., Chen Z.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in PeerJ (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
PeerJ (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41584827
PMCID
PMC12831514
DOI
10.7717/peerj.20582
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with conventional treatments such as pharmacotherapy and surgery presenting significant limitations. In recent years, novel biomaterials have emerged as a promising avenue in cardiovascular tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, offering innovative solutions for disease treatment. This review highlights the current applications and latest advancements of these biomaterials in cardiovascular tissue engineering, emphasizing their potential to enhance myocardial regeneration, vascular repair, and heart valve replacement. Key developments in biocompatible scaffolds, bioactive hydrogels, and smart biomaterials are discussed, along with their roles in promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Additionally, the review addresses the challenges associated with clinical translation, including biocompatibility, mechanical stability, and long-term efficacy. By exploring future directions, this article aims to provide insights into the transformative potential of biomaterials in revolutionizing cardiovascular therapy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansCardiovascular DiseasesBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsTissue EngineeringRegenerative MedicineTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research