Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialPubMedOpen access

Allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cell therapy on primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Qayyum AA., Lund TK., Jensen PB., Jensen K., Haack-Sørensen M., Ekblond A.

Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 31 on Immune Modulation, published in JHLT Open (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
JHLT Open (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
31
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40247997
PMCID
PMC12005341
DOI
10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100254
NCT
NCT04714801
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Background Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is common in lung transplantation affecting 15-30% of recipients. It represents a multifactorial injury to the transplanted lung within the first 72 hours after transplantation.We aimed to investigate clinical safety and efficacy of allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ASCs), as an add-on therapy in patients undergoing double lung transplantation. Methods Single center, double-blinded, investigator-initiated randomized phase I/II study with intravenous infusion of either ASCs or placebo within two hours after lung transplantation. A total of 31 patients were included and randomized 1:1:1 to either 200 million or 100 million ASCs, or placebo infusion.The primary endpoint was difference in PGD grade 72 hours after transplantation between groups. Results No significant differences in PGD were seen between the 3 groups 72 hours after lung transplantation (P=0.426). Combined ASC groups compared to placebo group did not show any difference in PGD 72 hours after transplantation (P=0.252). A reduced progression in PGD from day 1 to day 3 and day 2 to day 3 was observed between the ASC treated patients and patients in the placebo group (P=0.034 and P=0.034, respectively). There were no significant differences in number of serious adverse events or in secondary endpoints such as kidney function, lung function, or quality-of-life betw

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research