The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline of Interventional Treatments for Low Back Pain
Sayed D., Grider J., Strand N., Hagedorn JM., Falowski S., Lam CM.
Narrative Review on Back Pain, published in J Pain Res (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Pain Res (2022)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 36510616
- PMCID
- PMC9739111
- DOI
- 10.2147/jpr.s386879
- Citations
- 67
Abstract (original English)
Introduction Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety. Objective The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Methods The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Id
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: A systematic review of preclinical evidence, clinical translation, and future directions
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in N Am Spine Soc J (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
N Am Spine Soc J - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the Management of Stage III and IV Degenerative Disc Disease
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, Chronic Inflammation, published in Cureus (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Cureus1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Regenerative Therapies in the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: 2025 Update from the American Society Of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP).
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Scar, published in Pain Physician (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Pain Physician - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 736 on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in Neurospine (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 736
Neurospine1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Sirtuins in intervertebral disc degeneration: current understanding
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, Chronic Inflammation, published in Mol Med (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Mol Med11 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
A comprehensive review of cell transplantation and platelet-rich plasma therapy for the treatment of disc degeneration-related back and neck pain: A systematic evidence-based analysis
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in JOR Spine (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
JOR Spine22 citations