Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Autologous Lipofilling Improves Clinical Outcome in Patients With Symptomatic Dermal Scars Through Induction of a Pro-Regenerative Immune Response

Spiekman M., Francia DL., Mossel DM., Brouwer LA., Diercks GFH., Vermeulen KM.

Prospective Study on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Aesthet Surg J (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2022)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34270698
PMCID
PMC8922688
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjab280
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Background Autologous lipofilling is an emerging procedure to treat and possibly reverse dermal scars and to reduce scar-related pain, but its efficacy and mechanisms are poorly understood. Objectives The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that repeated lipografts reverse dermal scars by reinitiation of wound healing. Methods In a prospective, non-placebo-controlled clinical study, 27 adult patients with symptomatic scars were given 2 lipofilling treatments at 3-month intervals. As primary outcome, clinical effects were measured with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Scar biopsies were taken before and after treatments to assess scar remodeling at a cellular level. Results Twenty patients completed the study. Patients' scars improved after lipofilling. The total POSAS scores (combined patient and observer scores) decreased from 73.2 [14.7] points (mean [standard deviation]) pretreatment to 46.1 [14.0] and 32.3 [13.2] points after the first and second lipofilling treatment, respectively. Patient POSAS scores decreased from 37.3 [8.8] points to 27.2 [11.3] and 21.1 [11.4] points, whereas observer POSAS scores decreased from 35.9 [9.5] points to 18.9 [6.0] and 11.3 [4.5] points after the first and second treatment, respectively. After each lipofilling treatment, T lymphocytes, mast cells, and M2 macrophages had invaded scar tissue and were associate

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
CicatrixSkinHumansTransplantation, AutologousProspective StudiesImmunityAdult

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research