Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Efficacy in the Field of Regenerative Medicine: Product and Quality Control

Popescu MN., Iliescu MG., Beiu C., Popa LG., Mihai MM., Berteanu M.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Hair Regeneration, published in Biomed Res Int (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomed Res Int (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
34368346
PMCID
PMC8346315
DOI
10.1155/2021/4672959
Citations
30

Abstract (original English)

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a significant regenerative therapy used alone or combined mainly with stem cells, autologous fat grafts, hyaluronic acid, and biomaterials in a variety of medical fields, especially in hair regrowth, wound healing, and sports and rehabilitation medicine. However, the results obtained with this biologic therapy are heterogeneous and conflicting. The observed disparities in the effectiveness of PRP therapies may be due to a lack of standardization in blood processing and preparation. This article is aimed at reviewing the main biological parameters that need to be documented for a thorough reporting of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the PRP injected, to allow a comparison between the quality of samples and the clinically obtained results and advance the efforts towards treatment standardization.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRegenerative MedicineSports MedicineWound HealingQuality ControlPlatelet-Rich PlasmaPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research