Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Awake Rejuvenation With the Deep Plane Face Lift and Extended Deep Neck Contouring

Claytor RB., Tolan GC., Fuentes PM.

Retrospective Study on Facial Rejuvenation, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41800201
PMCID
PMC12962571
DOI
10.1097/gox.0000000000007305

Abstract (original English)

Background The deep plane face lift corrects progressive soft tissue sagging and neck laxity associated with the aging process. With patients requesting fewer procedures under general anesthetics, trends have turned toward performing minimally invasive procedures under tumescent local anesthesia. Many surgeons are apprehensive about operating on the deep structures of the neck with minimal anesthesia; thus, there is limited published data on the efficacy of more invasive procedures under tumescent local anesthesia, such as the deep plane face lift. This study aimed to illustrate the exceptional results that can safely be obtained when performing the deep plane face lift under tumescent local anesthesia. Methods Two hundred patients who underwent the deep plane face lift under tumescent local anesthesia between January 2020 and January 2024 were identified, and their charts were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of operation, concomitant procedures, and postoperative complications were recorded, and a descriptive analysis was performed. Results Seventeen (8.5%) patients experienced complications postoperatively, and there were no mortalities. The most common complications were wound infection (2.0%) and hematoma (2.0%). All patients who experienced complications were treated conservatively with complete resolution. No permanent motor nerve damage, xerostomia

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research