Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Benefit-Risk Assessment of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Implications for Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons

Cedirian S., Donati M., Rapparini L., Pampaloni F., La Placa M., Sgarzani R.

Narrative Review on Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic Wound, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40924351
PMCID
PMC12549488
DOI
10.1007/s13555-025-01537-5

Abstract (original English)

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have gained prominence for their efficacy in treating type 2 diabetes and obesity. Recent evidence suggests that their pleiotropic effects-beyond glycemic control and weight loss-include anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antioxidative effects, which may beneficially support various dermatologic conditions such as psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, acanthosis nigricans, and Hailey-Hailey disease. However, GLP-1 RAs are also associated with emerging cutaneous adverse drug reactions, including bullous, exanthematous and vasculitic manifestations, and other rare side effects. In aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, rapid weight loss induced by these agents has raised concerns regarding facial volume depletion, skin laxity, and impaired wound healing. In addition, perioperative management of patients on GLP-1 RAs requires careful assessment as a result of delayed gastric emptying and the associated potential risk of pulmonary aspiration. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on the benefit/risk profile of GLP-1 RAs, highlighting their impact for dermatologists and plastic surgeons in relevant contexts.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research