Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Beyond Traditional Risk Factors: Integrating Epicardial Adipose Tissue into the Comorbidity Landscape of HFpEF

Mihăilă MD., Caloian B., Frîngu FI., Irimie DA., Minciună IA., Pop D.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in J Clin Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Clin Med (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40943899
PMCID
PMC12429259
DOI
10.3390/jcm14176139
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), the visceral fat layer next to the myocardium, has become an important focus in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). When enlarged and inflamed, EAT increases pericardial restraint, releases fibroinflammatory mediators, and disrupts myocardial energetics, thereby reproducing the high-pressure, exercise-intolerant HFpEF phenotype regardless of body mass index. Modern echocardiography, cardiac CT, and MRI, enhanced by artificial intelligence texture analytics, now enable precise depot-specific quantification, making EAT a measurable therapeutic target. Early interventional studies suggest that caloric restriction, bariatric surgery, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, statins, PCSK9 antibodies, and colchicine can reduce EAT volume or alter its inflammatory profile, with concurrent improvements in haemodynamics and biomarkers. However, definitive outcome trials are still pending. Priority directions include standardising imaging cut-offs, mapping EAT immune-metabolic niches, and testing combined metabolic-inflammatory regimens to translate EAT modulation into precision therapy for HFpEF. This review aims to synthesise current mechanistic, diagnostic, and therapeutic insights on EAT in HFpEF and outline future research priorities.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research