Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Beyond wound closure: translational opportunities and barriers of mesenchymal stem cells and their extracellular vesicles in burn management

Wang Y., Li J., Zhang L., Liu J., Shu X., Ding Z.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Burns, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Cell Dev Biol (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42293746
PMCID
PMC13253750
DOI
10.3389/fcell.2026.1816224

Abstract (original English)

Burn injury management continues to present multiple clinical challenges, including infection, scar formation, and functional restoration. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their secretome (exosomes) have emerged as a cell-free therapy with multitarget potential in inflammation regulation, angiogenesis, epithelial regeneration, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling. Rather than classifying by cell origin, this review is guided by clinical needs and translational pathways to propose a framework for productization and translational development. MSC/EVs strategies exhibit unique advantages along the inflammation-regeneration-fibrosis axis, making them suitable for integration into dressings, delivery systems, and combination therapies. Current obstacles include donor and source consistency, Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance, standardization of Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), optimization of administration strategies, and selection of clinically meaningful endpoints. Establishing standardized production and quality-control systems, along with promoting multicenter randomized studies, is essential to achieve high-quality translation from research to clinical practice.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research