Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsRandomized Controlled TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Bibliometric Analysis of Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Hair Restoration, Facial Rejuvenation, Dental Procedures, and Gynecological Rejuvenation

Gupta AK., Taylor D.

Randomized Controlled Trial on Facial Rejuvenation, Hair Loss, published in Skin Appendage Disord (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Skin Appendage Disord (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40177000
PMCID
PMC11961137
DOI
10.1159/000541528

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) technologies offer an attractive treatment option for various medical fields. Owing to its high concentration of growth factors, PRP has been posited to induce proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis at the cellular level, as well as wound-healing and remodeling at the tissue level. The goal of the present bibliometric analysis was to characterize the growing body of literature concerning PRP use in various medical applications. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed on June 28, 2024, using Web of Science and SCOPUS databases, covering all available publications in selected categories from 2001 to present. Results PRP use for hair restoration had both the greatest number of total publications among the investigated applications, whereas PRP use in dental procedures had the longest-standing history of publications. PRP use in hair restoration and facial rejuvenation had the greatest number of placebo-controlled and double-blinded randomized controlled trials; however, the impact of results may suffer from a lack of consistency in PRP preparation and outcome measurement between different studies. Conclusion To effectively validate the utility of PRP across various medical interventions, careful consideration of methodology should be undertaken for future studies to ensure validity of results.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research