Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceSystematic ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Bio-boosting transplants: a systematic review on biopolymers in vascular composite allotransplantation

Knoedler L., Niederegger T., Schaschinger T., Fenske J., Murugan VPA., Knoedler S.

Systematic Review on Immune Modulation, published in Front Immunol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Systematic Review
Journal
Front Immunol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41635838
PMCID
PMC12861910
DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1645261
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) joins skin, muscle, bone, nerve, and vessels into a single graft that is both highly immunogenic and mechanically complex. Biopolymers, natural or synthetic, can provide structural scaffolding, localized drug release, and immune modulation. Although widely explored in solid-organ transplantation, their utility in VCA is poorly defined. We therefore conducted a systematic review to consolidate current evidence and map translational priorities. Methods Adhering to PRISMA 2020 and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251039845), we searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through April 2025. Original studies evaluating biopolymers in any VCA-relevant setting ( in vitro , animal, or clinical) were eligible. Clinical quality was judged with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and pre-clinical studies with the SYRCLE tool. Given methodological heterogeneity, findings were narratively synthesized. Results Eleven studies published between 2014 and 2024 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Collectively, they demonstrate that biopolymers, ranging from decellularized limb and auricular scaffolds to collagen-hydroxyapatite or polycaprolactone bone substitutes, hyaluronic-acid-functionalized vascular grafts, chitosan- or alginate-based drug-eluting coatings, and extracellular-matrix (ECM) sheets delivering cytotoxic T

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansBiopolymersGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalTissue ScaffoldsVascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research