Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Biochemical aspects of effects of mesenchymal stem cell treatment in chronic wounds progressive healing.

Athanerey A., Verma NR., Bhargava P., Amle D., Patra PK., Kumar A.

Prospective Study on Chronic Wound, published in Cell Tissue Bank (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Cell Tissue Bank (2022)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35849224
DOI
10.1007/s10561-022-10026-4
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Chronic wounds are a persistent burden for medical professionals. Despite developments and advancements in treatment, these wounds do not heal completely. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the epicenter of regenerative medicine that have shown promising results in chronic wound regeneration. Autologous peripheral blood-derived MSCs (PB-MSCs) are comparatively new in wound healing treatment, bone-marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs), and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are commonly being practiced. In the present study, PB-MSCs treatment was given to chronic wound patients. Various biochemical parameters like random blood glucose, serum urea, serum creatinine, bilirubin (total and direct), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), total protein, albumin levels, and association of other factors/conditions such as age, sex, addiction of drug/alcohol were also evaluated/compared with complete and without complete healing. The wound area of the ulcer was found to be significantly reduced and the wound was healthier after the treatment. These biochemical parameters could be certainly utilized as biomarkers to anticipate the risk of chronic wounds. These findings may contribute to the development of better wound care treatment strategies and drug discovery in the field of regenerative medicine.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationWound HealingMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research