Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Bioelectric Modulation as a Systems-Level Adjunct to Regenerative Therapies in Facial Plastic Surgery and Hair Restoration.

Leonhardt HJ., Keller GS., Pontius A.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42392657
DOI
10.1016/j.fsc.2026.05.003

Abstract (original English)

Regenerative strategies in facial plastic surgery increasingly incorporate platelet-rich fibrin, platelet-rich plasma, fat grafting, and emerging biologic agents. Despite widespread adoption, outcomes remain variable, in part due to limited control of upstream processes such as perfusion, extracellular matrix remodeling, and stem cell niche stability. To review the mechanistic basis and emerging clinical evidence supporting bioelectric modulation as a systems-level regulator of regenerative pathways relevant to facial rejuvenation, wound healing, and hair restoration. Bioelectric modulation represents a plausible investigational adjunct to biologic therapies in facial plastic surgery. Further studies are required to define efficacy, optimize treatment parameters, and evaluate long-term safety.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansHairRejuvenationFaceWound HealingSkin AgingRegenerationPlastic Surgery Procedures

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research