Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Bioengineering strategies for regeneration of skin integrity: A literature review

Shiraishi M., Sowa Y., Sunaga A., Yamamoto K., Okazaki M.

Narrative Review on Chronic Wound, published in Regen Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39790492
PMCID
PMC11713503
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2024.12.006

Abstract (original English)

Objective The skin is a complex organ that includes various stem cell populations. Current approaches for non-healing skin defects are sometimes inadequate and many attempts have been made to regenerate skin integrity. The aim of this review is to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical application of skin integrity regeneration. Methods A literature search was carried out in PubMed using combinations of the keywords "skin integrity", "tissue-engineered skin", "bioengineered skin", and "skin regeneration". Articles published from 1968 to 2023 reporting evidence from in vivo and in vitro skin regeneration experiments were included. Results These articles showed that stem cells can be differentiated into normal skin cells, including keratinocytes, and are a significant source of skin organoids, which are useful for investigating skin biology; and that emerging direct reprogramming methods have great potential to regenerate skin from the wounded skin surface. Conclusion Recent advances in skin regeneration will facilitate further advancement of both basic and clinical research in skin biology.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research