Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Biological characteristics of stem cells derived from burned skin-a comparative study with umbilical cord stem cells

Dolp R., Eylert G., Auger C., Aijaz A., Chen YA., Amini-Nik S.

Laboratory Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, Scar, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2021)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
33597003
PMCID
PMC7888080
DOI
10.1186/s13287-021-02140-z
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Burned human skin, which is routinely excised and discarded, contains viable mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (burn-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells; BD-MSCs). These cells show promising potential to enable and aid wound regeneration. However, little is known about their cell characteristics and biological function. Objectives This study had two aims: first, to assess critical and cellular characteristics of BD-MSCs and, second, to compare those results with multipotent well-characterized MSCs from Wharton's jelly of human umbilical cords (umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal/stem cells, UC-MSCs). Methods BD- and UC-MSCs were compared using immunophenotyping, multi-lineage differentiation, seahorse analysis for glycolytic and mitochondrial function, immune surface markers, and cell secretion profile assays. Results When compared to UC-MSCs, BD-MSCs demonstrated a lower mesenchymal differentiation capacity and altered inflammatory cytokine secretomes at baseline and after stimulation with lipopolysaccharides. No significant differences were found in population doubling time, colony formation, cell proliferation cell cycle, production of reactive oxygen species, glycolytic and mitochondrial function, and in the expression of major histocompatibility complex I and II and toll-like receptor (TLR). Importance, translation This study reveals valuable insights about MSC

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cells, CulturedMesenchymal Stem CellsUmbilical CordHumansBurnsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationWharton Jelly

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research