Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Biological disturbance of MiR-425 and its application prospects in cardiovascular diseases

Zhou S., Han B.

Narrative Review on Cardiovascular Disease, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Cell Dev Biol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40417179
PMCID
PMC12098596
DOI
10.3389/fcell.2025.1593241

Abstract (original English)

MiR-425 is a biological molecule that has potential applications in cardiovascular diseases. It can regulate biological functions by combining with LncRNAs, binding with proteins, and changing the differentiation of immune cells. MiR-425 also has a role as a biomarker of disease. In cardiovascular diseases, it has clinical significance in reducing inflammation and heart repair, inducing angiogenesis, improving the prediction of atherosclerosis, reducing cardiac fibrosis, and regulating atrial natriuretic peptide to affect cardiovascular function. Target gene prediction and KEGG enrichment analysis are also mentioned.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research