Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMCOpen access

Biological Therapy for Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head - A Case Report

Shankar AN., Jayakumar T., Pranav NG., Jeyaraman M.

Case Report / Series on Hip, published in J Orthop Case Rep (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
J Orthop Case Rep (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
37143549
PMCID
PMC10152959
DOI
10.13107/jocr.2023.v13.i01.3502
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a type of osteonecrosis with the disruption of blood supply to the head of the femur. Management of AVN femoral head depends on the stage of the disease. In this case report, we elaborated on the biological therapy for bilateral AVN of the femoral head. Case report A 44-year-old male presented with pain in both hips for 2 years with a history of rest pain in both hips. Radiologically, the patient was diagnosed with bilateral AVN of the femoral head. The patient was offered bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) in the right femoral head, followed up for 7 years, whereas the adult autologous live cultured osteoblasts in the left femoral head, followed up for 6 years. Conclusion Biological therapy with differentiated osteoblasts remains a viable option for AVN femoral head when compared with an undifferentiated BMAC cocktail.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research