Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Bioscaffold developed with decellularized human amniotic membrane seeded with mesenchymal stromal cells: assessment of efficacy and safety profiles in a second-degree burn preclinical model.

Naasani LIS., Pretto L., Zanatelli C., Paim TC., Souza AFD., Pase PF.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Biofabrication (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Biofabrication (2022)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36327453
DOI
10.1088/1758-5090/ac9ff4
Citations
8

Abstract (original English)

Therapies to deep burn injuries remain a global challenge. Human amniotic membrane (hAM) is a biomaterial that has been increasingly explored by the field of regenerative medicine. A decellularized hAM (DhAM) can be used as scaffold for mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to grow without the loss of their stemness potential, allowing its application as cell therapy for wound healing. In this work, we associated DhAM with adipose-derived MSCs (DhAM + AD-MSCs), as a therapy strategy for second-degree burns in a preclinical model. Animals with induced second-degree burns were divided into four groups: control, which consists of a non-adherent gauze; a synthetic commercial dressing as the positive control (Control+); DhAM; and DhAM plus rat AD-MSCs (DhAM + AD-MSCs), followed by detailed and long term analysis (5 weeks). The macroscopical analysis showed the healing improvement in the wound area after the DhAM + AD-MSC treatment. Histological analysis also showed no alteration in the animal organs and a regular epithelial progression in comparison to the control. This observation was also confirmed by the analysis of suprabasal layers in the neoepidermis with CK10, showing a stratified and differentiated epithelium, when compared to Control and Control+. A strong CD73 (ecto-5'-nucleotidase) labeling was observed in the first 2 weeks postburn in dermis and epidermis. The expression in d

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansRatsAnimalsAmnionMesenchymal Stem CellsBurnsWound HealingCell Differentiation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research