Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Biotechnological wound dressings based on bacterial cellulose and degradable copolymer P(3HB/4HB).

Volova TG., Shumilova AA., Nikolaeva ED., Kirichenko AK., Shishatskaya EI.

Animal Study on Chronic Wound, Burns, published in Int J Biol Macromol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Biol Macromol (2019)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
30872059
DOI
10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.068
Citations
19

Abstract (original English)

Hybrid wound dressings have been constructed using two biomaterials: bacterial cellulose (BC) and copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric and 4-hydroxybutyric acids [P(3HB/4HB)] - a biodegradable polymer of microbial origin. Some of the experimental membranes were loaded with drugs promoting wound healing and epidermal cells differentiated from multipotent adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. A study has been carried out to investigate the structure and physical/mechanical properties of the membranes. The in vitro study showed that the most effective scaffolds for growing fibroblasts were composite BC/P(3HB/4HB) films loaded with actovegin. Two types of the experimental biotechnological wound dressings - BC/P(3HB/4HB)/actovegin and BC/P(3HB/4HB)/fibroblasts - were tested in vivo, on laboratory animals with model third-degree skin burns. Wound planimetry, histological examination, and biochemical and molecular methods of detecting factors of angiogenesis, inflammation, type I collagen, and keratin 10 and 14 were used to monitor wound healing. Experimental wound dressings promoted healing more effectively than VoskoPran - a commercial wound dressing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiological DressingsBiopolymersBiotechnologyBurnsCell SurvivalCelluloseDisease Models, AnimalFibroblasts

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research