Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Breakthrough treatments for accelerated wound healing

Freedman BR., Hwang C., Talbot S., Hibler B., Matoori S., Mooney DJ.

Clinical Trial on Chronic Wound, published in Sci Adv (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Sci Adv (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
37196080
PMCID
PMC10191440
DOI
10.1126/sciadv.ade7007
Citations
275

Abstract (original English)

Skin injuries across the body continue to disrupt everyday life for millions of patients and result in prolonged hospital stays, infection, and death. Advances in wound healing devices have improved clinical practice but have mainly focused on treating macroscale healing versus underlying microscale pathophysiology. Consensus is lacking on optimal treatment strategies using a spectrum of wound healing products, which has motivated the design of new therapies. We summarize advances in the development of novel drug, biologic products, and biomaterial therapies for wound healing for marketed therapies and those in clinical trials. We also share perspectives for successful and accelerated translation of novel integrated therapies for wound healing.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansBiocompatible MaterialsWound Healing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research